Give a plain account of what happened. Four independent participants will discuss this live alongside your follow-up answers — the more concrete detail here, the sharper the discussion.
Stage 02 · Case-Specific Questions
A few details before the room opens
These questions are generated from your case summary above — jurisdiction and procedural facts materially change which statutes and precedent apply.
Stage 02 · Discussion Depth
How far should the room push it?
More rounds means more back-and-forth between the three discussants and Simar's cross-examination before synthesis — slower, but the surviving theory has been tested harder. Whichever depth you pick, the room will run the full number of rounds shown — it only stops earlier if you click "Stop & Synthesize Now" yourself.
Stage 03 · Live Discussion
Counsel's chambers
Four participants discuss the same file together, in the open, round after round. Simar sits as the standing critic — she doesn't propose her own theory, she stress-tests everyone else's until the discussion holds up or runs its course.
Jashan
Gursehaj
Keshav
Simar — Critic
ROUND 0 / 8 MAX
Stage 04 · Synthesis
Combining the discussion into three drafts
Reading the full chamber transcript for points of overlap and complementary strategy…
Stage 05 · Draft Review
Draft strategies
Synthesized from the full chamber discussion. Read the reasoning, then make the call — nothing here is final until you select one.
These are drafts for your review, not filings. Selecting a draft below does not submit or finalize anything — it opens the full working file so you can continue refining it with your own judgment.